Summary of New Hampshire's Administrative Driver's License Suspension Law
WARNING! If you refused to take a breath, blood or urine test after being arrested for DUI / DWI in New Hampshire, or if the results of your test were .08% blood alcohol or above, your license (or privilege to drive in New Hampshire if you are a non-resident) will be suspended 30 days after the arrest unless you or your attorney take appropriate action to demand an administrative hearing within 30 calendar days after arrest. For a first time refusal or breath test failure, your license will be suspended for 180 days without this hearing. If you have a prior DWI / DUI conviction or a prior refusal or breath test failure within the past 10 years, then your license or privilege to drive will be suspended for 2 years. This is called the Administrative License Suspension (ALS).
This "ALS" is based upon New Hampshire's implied consent laws, which provide that any person driving in the State of New Hampshire is "presumed" to impliedly consent to chemical testing if he/she is arrested on suspicion of driving while under the influence.
When you are arrested for DWI / DUI, you will be asked to submit to a breath or blood test. If a breath test indicates .08% blood-alcohol or more, (or .02% if under the age of 21), or you refuse to submit to chemical testing, your driver's license will be immediately confiscated by the police (unless it is an out-of-state license) and you will be issued a pink sheet of paper. This pink paper serves as a formal notice of immediate suspension, a temporary license valid for 30 days, and a technical explanation of the laws and procedures involved.
You, or your New Hampshire attorney should immediately notify the Divison of Motor Vehicles ("DMV") to contest the suspension at an administrative hearing. An ALS hearing is conducted by a hearings examiner who is an employee of the DMV. This person, although not necessarily legally trained, will act as the "judge". The hearing is conducted like a trial, but without a jury and with different due process and evidentiary rules than a criminal case. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has ruled that an ALS hearing is a civil proceeding, requiring proof by a preponderance of the evidence and not beyond a reasonable doubt.